The Ark of History

The two great individuals of ancient times – Noach and Avraham – had different personalities, were treated differently by G-d and their contemporaries suffered wholly different fates. Noach’s world was destroyed – the generation of the flood – while Avraham’s – the generation of the dispersion – was saved but scattered. Some explain the difference by highlighting one particular facet: Noach’s contemporaries were evil towards G-d but absolutely hideous towards each other, whereas the generation of the dispersion got along well with each other even though they rebelled against G-d. A society that is corrupt, immoral, depraved, angry, bitter, acrimonious and hostile towards anyone who is slightly different cannot long endure and cannot be saved.

Traditionally, we understand the difference between Noach and Avraham, and the implicit criticism of Noach, in that Noach made no effort to reach out to his generation. He was content to save himself, and did, while Avraham lived among his contemporaries, interacted with them, gained their respect over time, and influenced multitudes – he was the “father of a multitude of nations.”  But there is more to it than that

Rav Eliezer Melamed, Rav of Har Bracha, dealt recently with the following question: there are many moral and halachic challenges in the Israeli army today, some of them quite intentional as the remnants of the secular, progressive Israeli world attempt to impose Western culture and values on young draftees, especially religious ones. Given that, the questioner asked, aren’t the Haredim justified in trying to avoid those problems that carry with them a real risk of diluting one’s level of religious commitment if not eradicating it entirely?

To be sure, the Haredi world has changed substantially, and several thousand young Haredim now enlist every year, but the question focused not on numbers but on attitude. How should we deal with the spiritual dangers implicit in exposing impressionable young Jews to potentially heretical ideas and decadent environment?

Rav Melamed answered that the primary goal of haredim, and of exile Jews in general, was always hisardut, survival. Survival was everything – both physical survival and spiritual survival. To survive in the exile requires walls, and even occasionally, an ark, some secure, impregnable facility (or lifestyle) that removes us from the mainstream of society that is always beckoning, always enticing, and too often successful in luring us away from the world of Torah.

But such an attitude has no place in Israel. There the goal is not mere survival but rather living the complete Torah life, and that requires Torah study, observance of mitzvot, a state, an army, a government, industry and commerce and agriculture and much else. It requires living a complete life according to the Torah, and through that, the model Torah society is built.

I think Rav Melamed is both wise and correct – but what about Jews in the exile today? What ensures, or facilitates, our survival, with G-d’s grace? There are two possible models that we can follow, one follows Noach’s lead and the other the path of Avraham.

The first is to build an ark, to segregate ourselves, interact with others as minimally as possible, and wall ourselves off in the hopes of surviving the onslaught of spiritual allures and dangers that lurk around us. That was Noach’s approach.

The other model is Avraham, who lived in Elon Moreh, and Egypt, and Hevron, and had to go to war, and befriended Aner, Eshkol and Mamre, and tried to understand and help the evildoers of Sodom, and who had to deal with Pharaoh and Avimelech and the other debauched creatures of his day. Avraham shepherded his flock with them, made treaties with them, tried to educate them about the true G-d, and saw himself as part of his society, not aloof or estranged or above it all. And they recognized that as well, as the children of Het later said to him, “you are a prince of G-d among us.”

We could certainly stop here and say that the lesson is to be an Avraham rather than a Noach, and it is probably true and good advice, but even that is not dispositive. There is a danger in being an Avraham as there is in being a Noach. Neither was completely successful – Noach was certainly unsuccessful as his whole world was destroyed, he became a hermit and recluse after the flood and his descendants did not always adhere to his values. But even Avraham, our forefather and hero, he too had his share of frustrations and setbacks. There is a price to be paid in mingling with Sodom and the Philistines and the other degenerates who were his neighbors. His own son Yishmael was a casualty, as was Esav his grandson.

In truth, we live in a more open world today, and the Haredim live in a more closed world, but we each have our share of successes and failures. We all walk a fine line, even dangling on a precipice. It seems that the Haredi world loses some of its youth because of failed segregation; sometimes the highest wall is not enough, especially in a world in which there are incessant intrusions on our lives every minute and wherever we are. But we lose some of our youth because of failed integration: when we do not convey well enough the need for a wall of some height, for some barriers and moral limits; when we fail to teach our youth that we are not all the same and that we need to carve out for ourselves a special, spiritual place; when we fail to inculcate the notions of obligations and responsibility rather than privileges and feel-good spirituality.

Too much segregation doesn’t work, like too much integration doesn’t work. What is too much integration? One secular Jewish paper recently headlined that “Jewish” groups are upset about Justice Kavanaugh’s stance on Jewish issues and fear for the future. So what are their “Jewish” issues? Not Jewish education and tuition tax credits, and certainly not assimilation or intermarriage, of course not Israel, and not even his position on religious liberty matters. No – these left-wing Jewish groups are worried that Justice Kavanaugh is “wrong” on these four “Jewish” issues: abortion, immigration, sanctuary cities and affirmative action.

But I cannot quite determine what makes those Jewish interests; they are secular, political controversies that are roiling American society. We can certainly have opinions on them, and not just the one opinion mandated by the left-wing elites. They are not Jewish interests per se – but I do understand why those who think that way are rapidly disappearing from the Jewish world with a tenuous connection maintained only by a fluid definition of what it is to be a Jew.

So if neither segregation nor integration fully works, then what are we to do? And the answer is: both! We have to know when to segregate and when to integrate, when to get involved and when to step back. And above all, we must follow the sagacious guidance of Isaiah the prophet who said long ago (54:2): “Broaden the place of your tent and stretch out the curtains of your dwelling place; do not hesitate.”  We have to reach and not completely wall ourselves off. But also: “lengthen your cords and strengthen your pegs.” We have to make sure that our tent is in order, firmly attached to the ground, before expanding outwardly. A tent that is not rooted is blown away by the first stormy wind that drifts over us.

The more rooted we are and the deeper our commitment, the more we can expand. First we plant roots, and then we spread out, and we will thus merit the realization of the eternal covenant and the promise of complete redemption, speedily and in our days.

2 responses to “The Ark of History

  1. I suspect that some people abandon Judaism because their fellow Jews: spread rumors about them, or stole from them, or rejected them, or hated them.

    {1} I once knew a girl who was born into a religious Jewish family. Unfortunately, she had a strange-looking face [through no fault of her own, she was born that way], and she was ridiculed by her sisters, and was probably ridiculed by many others. This girl abandoned Judaism in her teenage years, and now she dresses in ways that make it obvious that she no longer follows the spiritual path of her parents.

    {2} Another girl quit Judaism because nobody wanted to marry her.
    She was a nice and sincere person, but she had: no good looks, no money, and no distinguished ancestors. A non-Jewish man became her husband.

    {3} Other people have been tempted to abandon Judaism completely because their fellow Jews spread humiliating rumors about them.

    In most cases, those rumors were spread by people who were never harmed by the people who they slandered. Everybody who hears the rumors accepts them as true, even without evidence, and even though listening to slander and believing slander are both prohibited by the laws of Judaism.

    {4} Some people have been tempted to abandon Judaism completely because they were thrown out of synagogues for unjust reasons.

    One person was asked to leave a certain synagogue and never return.

    When the victim asked why he was being thrown out, the Rabbi explained that the victim had done nothing wrong, but his presence could not be tolerated because nobody knows who he is.
    In other words, he was guilty until proven innocent.

    {5} Another person was falsely accused of being a pushka-thief.

    This was the evidence of his guilt: First he was Sephardic. Second, nobody knew who he was. With brilliant logic like this, who needs Sherlock Holmes?

    {6} There was another incident where the 11-year-old grandson of a synagogue Rabbi intentionally started a fight with a congregation member by going out of his way to ridicule the congregation member, who had never harmed him in any way. The 11-year-old boy also recruited several other boys his age to ridicule the congregation member, for no reason.

    When the congregation member gave his 11-year-old persecutor an angry look, he was immediately thrown out of the synagogue, with everyone watching, and threatened with arrest by the police if he ever returned [apparently, a man can now be threatened with arrest for giving an angry facial expression to a child].

    When the congregation member was being thrown out of the synagogue, the father of the boy explained: “This is HIS shul!” –
    in other words, the synagogue is somehow the property of the misbehaving 11-year-old boy, who was never made to apologize for that incident,
    even though he was the aggressor.

    The victim of that incident now uses his computer and electric lights on Shabbat, after 35 years of being completely Shomer Shabbat.
    Rabbi Pruzansky’s opinion about these incidents is requested.
    Time Magazine vs Truth:
    Who are the Palestinians?
    How Torah Can Defeat Terrorism:
    Did Captain Kirk believe in negotiating with terrorists?
    How to Pray for Tzahal-IDF:
    Rambam Rejected Childless Messiah:
    Was Daniel an Orthodox Jew?