Category Archives: Jewish History

The Challenge of Chanuka

   One brief and insightful idea about Chanuka from Rav Shlomo Aviner is worth sharing. When all is said and done, relatively very few Jews participated in the Hasmonean rebellion. Most Jews were Hellenists, many had despaired in the face of the reigning superpowers whose culture seemed superior to that of the Jews and whose might and dominance seemed invincible, and many others simply saw the struggle for religious freedom and regained sovereignty over the land of Israel under such circumstances as a futile quest. What held them back ? In a word: realism.

     A realistic assessment of the military and political conditions of the Jews was undoubtedly a major factor in the complacency of their society. The Greco-Syrian empire was too powerful, too numerous, too strong, and too sophisticated. They had the support of the elites, they were the envy of the ancient world, and their society was unconstrained by such niceties as monotheism – deference to a G-d who is the Creator of the Universe as well as the Author of the moral code by which His creatures are obligated to live. Many Jews found “freedom” in the enslavement brought upon them by Greek culture. They had no use for the Temple and its service, or for the parochial interests of the Jewish people in the face of the pervasiveness of Greek civilization.

     By contrast, Jews were few in number, militarily and politically insignificant, and not fully recovered from the debacle that led to the destruction of the First Temple. Many “leaders” of the Jews were impious, and the Temple service itself had been corrupted. Every rational argument – every slice of realism – dictated that all Jews simply accept their fate as a vassal of the Greek Empire, and, like all other conquered nations had done, just assimilate into the great Hellenist culture.

     One family stood in the way, and they too were realists, but realists of a different sort – with one added dimension. Yehuda and his men also knew the odds against them, the superiority of the enemy, and the defeat of even greater military forces than they could muster. But Yehuda also knew that running through all of Jewish history is a streak of anti-realism, or, better, said, a realism that takes into account Divine Providence.

    It was unrealistic for one family to go into Egyptian exile, and rather than blend into that mighty empire, instead emerge from bondage as a nation eager to return to its homeland. It was unrealistic to expect a nation of millions to survive 40 years in the Sinai wilderness, or defeat 31 Canaanite kings. It was unrealistic to expect Jews to weather destruction and exile to Babylon – and return and establish a Second Jewish Commonwealth. All this Yehuda knew, and so rather than being deterred, he was inspired.

    What he did not know was that it was unrealistic for Jews to survive as a nation the second destruction of the Temple, and a long exile in which Jews were tormented by Romans, Byzantines, Zoroastrians, Christians, Muslims, Nazis and Communists for 19 centuries. He certainly did not know that such a scattered and weakened people would meet with Divine favor and again – after 19 centuries – return to its divinely-granted homeland and re-establish an independent state, both historically unprecedented achievements, and all as predicted by the Jewish prophets of old.

    For many, realism sounds rational and cogent, but this type of realism – that fails to account for all possible factors – is misleading and ambiguous. The realism of conventional wisdom is, for many, an albatross, and leads to small minds thinking small thoughts, and constricting all the possibilities implicit in the renaissance of the Jewish people. They are today’s Hellenists, and their voices are strident and their writings abound. They preach despair, concessions, and surrender. They pride themselves on forecasting the “inevitability” of … a Palestinian state, the dissolution of Israel, Iranian nuclear weapons, Islamic-terrorist power. They say “can’t” when they mean “won’t” – and it is their fecklessness that fuels their conception of what is “inevitable.”

       For Jews, the “G-d factor” cannot simply be an intellectual exercise or a pleasant abstraction, but rather an essential component of our world view and our policy objectives. G-d’s Providence is our reality, and we ignore it at our peril. Even lacking prophecy today, one can attempt to look at events in Israel with a providential eye, even if the conclusions are speculative. The natural forces afflicting Israel today are stunning, as they are catastrophic. An enduring drought has been followed this week, even partially caused, the fires that have ravaged the north of Israel and tragically consumed so many lives. Perhaps – and I write this with humility – if Jews were not so eager to freeze the land of Israel, G-d would unfreeze the heavens over Israel; perhaps if we built the land together, we would not have to behold its burning under our feet.

    I don’t know, and as hazardous as it is to speculate in these areas, it is probably even more hazardous to ignore any such implications, and instead attribute everything to nature, geopolitics, money, power and the like. That is a brutal and cold approach to life – an ungodly view – that seems to be the coin of the realist realm.

     Chanuka is unique in that it was the very first time after the era of prophecy in which Jews (a small group, to be sure) arose and stated publicly that our faith in G-d is an active and practical element of our political calculations. It was not the last – and, as always, relatively few Jews even today account for the uniqueness of our history in their deliberations, and see through the “realism” that hampers and hinders us to a greater “realism” that is before us: the inevitability of Jewish destiny of which Chanuka is an annual and joyous reminder.

    May it always guide our decisions and thoughts, may we all rejoice together on this Chanuka, may G-d give us the strength to re-plant each tree and rebuild each home in the land of Israel, and may He send a speedy recovery to this week’s injured and consolation to the bereaved.

The Palestinian “State”

     There are persistent reports that the Palestinian Authority, unable to achieve its diplomatic goals through negotiations, is considering upping the ante and unilaterally declaring statehood. This gambit was tried once before, in 1988, and did not quite excite themselves or the international community. But what are the potential consequences of such a declaration of statehood, and how would it affect Israel’s short-term and long-term interests ?

    It should be stated that a unilateral declaration violates the Oslo Accords that specifically prohibited such actions, but Oslo has been a dead letter for so many years. Only Israel continued the charade that the agreements mattered and should be enforced. But the Accords, which, for example, prohibited terror, anti-Israel incitement in Arab schools and media, etc., have been a macabre joke for a decade and half. Few even mention it anymore, except in the context of the Yitzchak Rabin memorials. So a declaration of Palestinian statehood would not be the final nail in the coffin of Oslo (that nail has long been hammered) but just add another meter of soil on its grave, and perhaps end the pretense of its viability.

    Several questions arise, each with important ramifications: how would such a declaration be made ? If the PA simply announces its statehood, countries may or may not extend it recognition. But most of those who would recognize it already recognized it in 1988. Nothing substantive changes unless the United States recognizes a Palestinian state, which is quite possible, and would increase President Obama’s estrangement from the Jewish community. (Diehard Jewish Democrats, for whom Israel is a peripheral concern, will surely rationalize that acceptance as courageous, far-sighted and an expression of his love of Jews.) Or, the PA can seek recognition through the UN Security Council, where such a resolution can be blocked by a US veto or not blocked at all, producing the same scenario mentioned above. In such a case, it will be fascinating to see how liberal Jews contort themselves to defend a president who has put the power and prestige of the United States behind a division of Jerusalem and a severance of the Jewish national connection to Hevron, Bet Lechem, and other parts of Judea and Samaria.

     What will be the borders of such a state ? Declarations of statehood usually denote the extension of sovereignty by the declaring party over a particular population and geographical location. Declarations where the territory under the control of the new state is left undefined are uncommon, but they have occurred. If the PA, as is likely, declares its statehood at the 1967 borders, this engenders several interesting developments.

    On the positive side, Israel now would have an address to which it can respond forcefully to a terrorist attack. A nation is responsible (novel concept for these Arabs) for all acts that take place within or emanate from its territory – like Lebanon should be held responsible today for Hezbollah aggression. So a Jew attacked in Hevron can – and should – lead to the immediate leveling by Israel of the PA headquarters in Ramallah. They become the responsible party, and can no longer hide behind the fig leaf of militants, guerrillas , or organizations with phony new names and acronyms. Such a state might not last long.

     The Palestinian state would also be in the unenviable position of having to admit its essentially racist character when it asserts that Jews have no right to live there. How will European liberals tap dance around that one ? Arabs can live in the Jewish state and even be citizens, but Jews cannot live in the Arab state ? Even the UN might not be able to swallow that blatant hypocrisy, although, admittedly, the UN’s hypocrisy has thus far been limitless.

    Unfortunately, the down side is more compelling. From the perspective of the “world community” (knaves and liars, all), a State of Palestine will render all Jewish settlement illegal, and intensive pressure – probably including the threatened imposition of sanctions – will be levied on Israel unless it ethnically cleanses the area of Jews. But it is the presence of Jews in the settlements of YESHA that keep the lid on that tinderbox, and prevents the extension of terror to Israel’s coastal plane. In one simple and sobering example, a Judenrein Judea and Samaria will leave planes landing at Ben Gurion Airport vulnerable to missile attacks. And Israeli raids into that “state” would undoubtedly generate the same hostile reaction from the “world” that Israel’s foray into Gaza – in self-defense – did almost two years ago.

    One who thinks that Israel will simply be able to raid – or re-conquer – Judea and Samaria to pre-empt Arab missile attacks is engaging in wishful and fanciful thinking. (I recall a forum in DC in early 2005 in which the eminent Charles Krauthammer stated that he favored the Gaza surrender on the grounds that if the missiles from Gaza continued, Israel could then rightfully “blow it to smithereens.” When I challenged him that the “world” would object and found some pretext not to allow Israel to defend itself, he dismissed that as meaningless and unlikely. Guess again.)

    Even more menacing would be the prospect of the new “state” being internationally accepted (UN membership and all, probably fast-tracked to a seat on the Security Council which Israel has always been denied), but with the war against Israel continuing unabated on the grounds of the need to “achieve justice for the refugees.” In essence, the Arabs will be able to claim the full benefits of statehood, accept none of the consequences, and continue to abet terror in pursuit of “justice.” Worse, the legitimization of a Palestinian state will begin to undo the very legitimacy of Israel’s existence, even as the ongoing claims for justice further weaken the liberal Jew’s willingness to support Israel – already enervated by decades of assimilation, spiritual ignorance and national indifference. If the world unites around the prospect that Jerusalem, Hevron, and Bethlehem are not Jewish cities, then challenges to Tel Aviv and Haifa are not far behind.

    It is not too difficult to remember the day when Israel’s foreign policy was predicated on the notion that the existence of a Palestinian state is tantamount to the destruction of Israel. It was only 20 years ago that such a notion was universally accepted in Israel, if not among Israel’s friends. The Israelis and Oslo vitiated that concept, notwithstanding that it is as true today as it was in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, if not more true.  That stance was always buttressed by the simple, irrefutable fact that between 1948 and 1967 – when Judea, Samaria and Gaza were governed by Arab states, not by Israel – there was no Arab interest in or movement towards the creation of a State of Palestine. None – and it could have been done with the stroke of a pen, and without Israel’s consent.  The interest arose – that is to say, the farce began – only after the Six-Day War.

    Since the declaration of a State of Palestine therefore poses a mortal danger to Israel’s existence, Israel should let it be known now that such a declaration will not only void any prior agreements made with the Palestinians but will also be construed as a declaration of war, and with all the attendant consequences of a declaration of war.

   And to the unsympathetic Obama administration, Israel should state – privately and bluntly – what former PM Yitzchak Shamir told James Baker, Secretary of State for President Bush (41) and hostile to Israel to his core, when he made unreasonable demands on Israel and backed them up with threats:

Mr. Secretary, you can demand what you choose to demand but this is our country and we will not agree to do anything that will harm its interests and future even if demanded by our best friend” (quoted by Yair Shamir, the former PM’ son, in the Jewish Press, October 13, 2010).

     That type of backbone, inner strength and unshakeable convictions will come in handy in the near future – for Israel’s leaders, for the Jewish people, and our friends across the world.

The Succa of Leviathan

     There is much more to Succot than meets the eye. There is the physical Succa of walls and schach (roofing), the Succot of the four species, the exhilaration of “the season of our rejoicing” and the Succot of the Torah, the commemoration of G-d’s preservation of the Jewish people during our sojourn in the wilderness and beyond.

     But there is also the hidden Succot – another dimension that looms beneath the surface – the Succot of the seventy sacrificial bulls, offered in the Temple on behalf of the nations of the world, and the Succot of the future, when all nations will gather to celebrate Succot in Jerusalem. How do we get from one Succot – the particular celebration of the Jewish people – to the global celebration of Succot ?

    And what exactly do we celebrate ? Succot is the only one of the festivals that does not commemorate a specific event – Pesach celebrates the moment of our national birth, and  Shavuot the revelation of G-d that gave us the Torah. But Succot has no individual event associated with it. So what are we celebrating ?

    And perhaps the greatest mystery of Succos is a Midrash  cited in Yalkut Iyov 927: “R. Levi said: whoever fulfills the mitzva of Succa in this world, G-d will place him in the future in the Succa of Leviathan.” But what is that, and why do we aspire to such a Succa ?

     Leviathan is one of the two creatures singled out by G-d in the book of Iyov as examples of His infinite power and wisdom – behemoth, the enormous land animal, and leviathan, the monster of the sea. To further complicate matters, Leviathan itself has two forms – the nachash bariach, the straight serpent, and nachash akalaton, the coiled serpent, both referenced as well in Isaiah 27 where the prophet states that in the future G-d will unsheathe His mighty sword and kill both. So who and what are these, and why do we want them dead ?

     Rav Shamshon Rafael Hirsch writes in a brilliant essay (Collected Writings, Volume II) that Leviathan represents the forces of evil in the world that are submerged, and yet threaten the stability of mankind again and again. The nachash bariach, the straight serpent, are the nations that rule through brute force and impose their will on mankind directly, through their power, while nachash akalaton, the coiled serpent, are those nations that rule through cunning and manipulation, that achieve their ends through stealth and secrecy. Both are dangerous – and both need to be kept apart.

    “If the two forces ever mated, the whole world would be destroyed” (ibid 926), i.e., if might ever combined with cunning, they would be unstoppable. Built into history is the inability of powerful empires to sustain themselves, because they become impressed with their own might and their own invincibility. And they usually self-destruct.

     It is both depressing and astonishing when we contemplate the persistence of evil in the world. From the time of the primeval serpent until today, the world has not seen a moment’s respite – and especially since the creation of the Jewish people, evil has always had a defined target. Sometimes the enemy’s assault is frontal and sometimes it is circuitous – but it lingers – and our enemies are, usually, the oppressors of others, as well. Even if one evildoer disappears, another appears; even if we think that the world learned a lesson through a spasm of violence and mayhem, the lesson is short-lived. The carnage of World War I – “the war to end all wars” – was a trifle compared to World War II, and the savagery and depth of evil did nothing to prevent the rise of Communist tyrants. And their demise did not thwart the ascension of the despots and terrorists of the Arab and Muslim world. It never ends. And this week’s gathering of despots and tyrants among the free world’s leaders at the UN seemingly underscores that bleak prospect.

    But it does end, and that is the eternal message – the hidden message – of Succot. Rav Lior Engleman notes that, unlike the other holidays, Succot does not commemorate an event, but it celebrates a process, the long road, with all its twists and turns, all of its surprises and dangers – with one constant: the protective hand of G-d. On Succot, we are reminded of the cycle – every day (except Shabbat) we circumambulate the shul, starting and ending at the same point; on Succot, we are judged on the year’s water supply – which is not only a palindrome (mayim in Hebrew) – but also comes to us through nature’s cycle.

    On Succot, we live our normal life and rejoice in the Succa, because there is unlimited joy in our regular lives under the protective wings of the Divine Presence. Whoever can do that in this world – with all the evil lurking around us – the evil of the brutes and the evil of the sophisticates – with all the enemies who wish us ill, and with all the “good” people who make their accommodations with evil – whoever is able to see history as a process, with a beginning and an end and not lose faith – “G-d will seat them in the Succa made from the skin of Leviathan.” When evil is vanquished, and human society – the great Leviathan – is tamed and refined, then the righteous will bask in the Succa made of that fishy substance and become the foundation of a new society dedicated to G-d’s service, when the remaining nations gather to serve G-d in Jerusalem, when He will be One and His name acknowledged as One.

Numbers Game

   The Torah teaches that “G-d did not desire us or choose us because we are more numerous than the other nations, for we are the fewest of all the peoples” (Devarim 7:7) But why would we think otherwise ? As the commentator Rashbam asks: did Moshe really believe that the Jewish people thought that G-d had chosen us because of our numerical superiority ? It is obviously not so. So what exactly is the point that Moshe was making?

     On a superficial level, people are always impressed by the most, of anything. The largest country in population (China), the largest country in size (Russia), the most, the greatest, the fastest, the smartest, even the most home runs (however they were hit). It makes for interesting conversation, but what is the difference really ? Numbers do not impress us. There are more than a billion Christians and more than a billion Moslems in the world, but we are “the fewest of nations,” infinitesimal on the world stage. Clearly, we are taught that G-d’s designation of the Jewish people was not dependent on numbers, and nor is our destiny.

      There is a deeper point as well. The Torah is teaching us that numbers not only do not determine worth, but they are never a significant factor in assessing the state of Jewish life. Notwithstanding that, we have such a numbers obsession in Jewish life that one would think, firstly, that the Torah posited such a viewpoint, and secondly, that our future existence is based completely on maintaining some arbitrary figure, some critical mass of Jews. We have such a numbers obsession that even hearing this iconoclasm, you must think that I am in need of a vacation.

    The fact is that numbers have never mattered for much in Jewish life. There are as many Jews today as there was before World War I, and 5,000,000 more than in 1882. There are perhaps 10% more Jews alive today than at the time of the destruction of the Second Temple. We never grow that much, the enduring legacy of both assimilation and persecution. But here is another way to look at it: the world has tripled in size since the start of World War I, and we have stayed the same; but have we fallen off the map ? Are Jews unknown in the world ? We have gone from being .006 of the world’s population, to being .002. Are we less influential ? Are we harder to find ? Do we find it harder to get our names in the newspapers ? They still know where to find us, even though we are “the fewest of nations.” There are almost three times as Daoists in the world as there as Jews, and ten times more Yoruba. Go figure.

     We have been conditioned to believe that numbers matter. We hear constantly that we need to boost our numbers, especially by making peace with intermarriage, and especially today by broadening our base by accepting converts who are not sincere about a Jewish commitment. If we write off the intermarried, the argument goes, our numbers shrink. If we do not embrace his non-Jewish wife and children, we will not achieve some numerical quota that we have apparently set for ourselves. It is the same reason that compels Jews to initiate a program of mass conversions, regardless of commitment, to boost Israel’s population, to ensure that we meet an artificial target that, if reached, will ensure Jewish survival. It has even led some to argue that the definition of Jewishness should be “any person that Hitler would have murdered” (i.e., a person with even one Jewish grandparent, sometimes one Jewish great-grandparent), leading to the macabre result that they have designated Hitler as the posek for the Jewish people, the decisor of Jewish law and identity. Talk about posthumous victories; that indeed would be an ultimate triumph. Fortunately, we are able to rely on the Torah to adjudicate these matters, and not a diabolical, pathological, mass murderer.

      We are the smallest of nations, and every nation needs people to survive. We do, too, but more than some arbitrary number of people, we need good Jews, Jews who make a difference, Jews who want to be Jews – not just Jews in name, who will just pay dues or have to chased down to pay their dues, or Jews whom our enemies flesh out. “For you are a holy people, and   G-d chose you to be His people” (Devarim 7:6), and therefore there are as many Jews at any one moment as G-d determines He needs for His purposes. There are never too few or too many; it is always just right. That “you are not more numerous” means that every Jew is precious, but that abstract numbers mean nothing at all. We are not trying to meet a particular quota.

      We need good Jews. Capricious figures plucked out of the air avoid dealing with the main issue: how do we produce good Jews, Jews who make a difference, who make their mark in the public domain in a way that reflects well on all of us. For example, an observant woman named Wendy Shalit became a counter-cultural phenomenon in the last decade, writing books encouraging a “Return to Modesty: Discovering the Lost Virtue” and “Girls Gone Mild: Young Women Reclaim Self-Respect”, about modesty and self-respect for young women in the world at large, about how young women need not ape the immodest fashions or behavioral trends in order to win friends.      

       Even in our world we struggle with this aspect of human dignity. There are religious girls who are forced to wear modest clothing to school – RULES – whose parents don’t mind them dressing down (or skimpier) on the weekends. They send a terrible (and awfully) mixed message. But this issue has only slowly entered the secular discourse, and to achieve that – to have a religious Jewish woman in the forefront of a moral issue (instead of evangelicals or Moslems) – is a sanctification of G-d’s name.  One Wendy Shalit is more meaningful that any 50 Jews in Hollywood who debase the culture. But you wouldn’t know it because of our numbers obsession.      

     The day will come, the prophet Zecharia said, when “ten non-Jews will grab the coat of a Jew and say ‘let us go with you, because we have heard that G-d is with you.’” The nations will ultimately turn to us and say “teach us.”

     But are we ready for that moment ? Do we have what to teach ? Are we secure in our values, and are we still shaped by the common culture and its frequent tawdriness ?

     So why did G-d give us the Torah ? The Ramban here quotes the Talmud (Beitza 25b) that we were given the Torah because we are a tough people – a people that can withstand all the blandishments, allures and threats of the world, and endure all trials and tribulations tossed our way. We need strong Jews, not Jews who desire special accommodations because they cannot resist temptation, nor Jews who are easily broken by misfortune or prone to despair. We are the people who are eternally comforted, and therefore never lose faith in G-d or in His Torah.

     The prophet Isaiah (40:3) declared that our task is always to clear the path for G-d, to build a straight road for His seekers – not one with detours, excursions, amusing twists and turns – to keep it straight and simple. Then we will merit the days of understanding and faith, with all Jews present and accounted for, and enjoy the fruits of a glorious redemption, for us and all mankind.