Category Archives: Contemporary Life

Shameless Politics as Usual

No further evidence of the decrepitude – the sheer depravity – American politics is necessary, but if it were, this case sums it up nicely.

Massachusetts law (like that of many other states) long empowered the state governor to fill a vacancy in the United States Senate (due to death or resignation) by appointing an interim senator who would fill    the seat until the next election.

In 2004, the law was abruptly amended to strip the governor of that right (which really hasn’t worked well, in any event, as in Roland Burris and Rod Blagojevitch), and to call for a special election within six months. The impetus, of course, was not the imprudence of the legislation but a “technical” problem: John Kerry, the Democratic Senator, anticipating his election as President, persuaded the Democratic legislature to amend the law, which would have allowed then Republican Governor Mitt Romney to appoint his, presumably Republican, replacement.

It was duly amended, but Kerry, of course, lost the election.

Fast forward to 2009, as in “now.” With the death of Senator Kennedy, and having to wait six months for the “special election” that decides his successor, the Senate Democrats were suddenly left one-vote shy of the 60-seat filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. And with a Democratic governor now in office, the law stripping the governor of his appointment privileges now seemed like a bad idea, as he, Deval Patrick, would certainly appoint a Democrat.

So the legislature is currently debating a bill that would restore the old, pre-Romney, rule, allowing the governor to appoint a replacement pending the special election.

It would be a comical farce if it were not so cynical, manipulative and downright shameless.

Are politicians beyond shame ? Perhaps. But if they had even a shred of decency they would pass the following law, to avoid the necessity of re-visiting this scenario every few years: “Henceforth, US Senate vacancies from Massachusetts will be filled by gubernatorial appointment when the state governor is a Democrat, and by special election when the state governor is a Republican.”

Then they can return to the business of raising taxes to prop up their bankrupt state-mandated health insurance program.

Optimism

Our Sages state (Megila 31b) that Ezra ordained that Jews read the “curses” of the book of Devarim immediately before Rosh Hashana (the sedra of Ki Tavo), so that, symbolically, “the year and its curses will end,” and a new, more joyous year will commence.

Each year has its share of blessings and curses, but the bad tidings seem to linger a bit longer and transform our lives in unanticipated ways. Illness and death, job loss and economic hardship, personal upheaval and psychological dislocation can shatter the way we see ourselves and our world and leave us reeling, groping for some words of comfort or grounds for optimism. But they are there, if only we open our minds and our hearts to them.

My late cousin, Ehud Manor, one of Isael’s greatest songwriters, was commissioned in 2003 by the Zionist Congress convening in Yerushalyim to compose an “optimistic song,” following several years of persistent death and mayhem, and pervasive despondency, in Israel. He wrote one of his last songs, simply titled “An Optimistic Zionist Song” (Shir Tzioni Optimi), but its lyrics (not exclusive to Zionism) are profound, inspiring, and filled with solace and succor for anyone who has experienced difficult moments and remains troubled by the vicissitudes of life. The song breeds a sense of optimism about life – its value, its opportunities – and reinforces what is perhaps one of the essential notions about life that often takes years to learn: we usually cannot control our circumstances; we can only control how we respond to those circumstances.

Herewith follows “An Optimistic Zionist Song” (translation mine; the Hebrew, of course, rhymes, and the melody is upbeat):

Deep within the winter you will find that there is still within you summer,

deep within the sadness you will find that there is still within you joy,

deep within the night you will find that there is still within you morning,

deep within the anger you will find that there is still within you forgiveness.”

“Deep within the fear you will find that there is still within you courage,

deep within the silence you will find that there is still within you a voice,

deep within the ice you will find that there is still within you a flame,

deep within the clouds, you will again find the blue-white-blue.”

Life can contain within it a coldness that appears relentless, a gloom that seemingly will never lift, a night that never ends, and an anger that people can cling to – long after the causes of that anger have faded into the mists of time. They all stifle our initiative, rob us of our zest, and cheat us out of years on this earth. We become paralyzed by uncertainty, and think that our predicaments are frozen and the good life unachievable.

That is an error, because the means of our psychological liberation usually lie within us – if only we desire to dig deep, to access it, to bring to the fore new, heretofore buried but healthier emotions. That is the choice we are given – in the Torah’s words, “and you will choose life, so that you and your descendants may live” (Devarim 30:19). The person who is embittered by life stops living, and pejoratively colors the way his/her children will view the world, as well. Certainly, not every problem in life can be solved with the right attitude, but every problem can be ameliorated with the right attitude.

“And if you are not an optimist, it is a sign that you are no longer young,

and if you are not an optimist, it is a sign that you must again wake up,

to the chirping of birds, to the gentle winds from the sea, and

to the  fragrance of the citrus in bloom.”

“And if you are not an optimist, it is a sign that you are no longer young,

and if you are not an optimist, it is a sign that you must again wake up,

to the laughter of children, to the sun that still rises, and

to the song of several friends.”

The young have a boundless sense of optimism. They see a world of limitless potential, as the tableau on which they will implement their dreams. As we age, we realize we will not fulfill half of our quests in life (probably, for the better). But the sense of hopefulness must remain – as we appreciate the carefree chatter of children and grandchildren, the beauty of the world around us, the deep and abiding relationships we have with family and friends that enrich our lives, and the opportunity to serve Hashem at every stage in life. On Rosh Hashana, we are again all children, davening with our parents and grandparents even if they are not physically present, and standing before our Father in Heaven: “Have compassion on us, as a father has compassion on children.”

“Deep within the silence you will find that there is still within you a voice,

deep within the clouds, you will again find the blue-white-blue.”

We can thus dispatch “the year and its curses,” and usher in “the new year and its blessings” – that our lives will be filled with good health and bounty spent wisely, that our voices will resonate with Torah and tefila, that the people of Israel will be blessed with tranquility, that we will all find solace and hopefulness in the pleasure of friends and our community, and that we will be worthy this year of beholding the redemption of Israel and all mankind.

Repentance and Ted Kennedy

We are all about to be judged by the King of Kings, as “all inhabitants of the universe pass before Him like a flock of sheep.” That is both good news and bad news.

The good news is that our Sages teach that we are judged by the preponderance of our deeds. In Rambam’s words (Laws of Repentance, Chapter 2) “every human being has merits and demerits. If his good deeds outnumber his sins, then he is deemed righteous; if his sins outnumber his virtues, then he is deemed wicked.” In other words, majority good, we are meritorious; majority evil, we are guilty. By that calculation, most of us fare very well, because most people are casual sinners but basically good.

The bad news is that we are incapable of making these calculations, as Rambam continues: “There are some individual merits that outweigh even a multitude of sins, and some sins so heinous that they outweigh even a multitude of merits, and only the knowledge of the Knower of All can assess these individual acts.” Ouch.

The question that I have been pondering is: do we judge a person based on one or two atrocious acts ? Can they overshadow even a large number of good acts ? Are we defined by the one big thing, or by a host of small things ?

In truth, the recent death of Ted Kennedy started me thinking along these lines, because he is an excellent example of this conundrum. Obituaries always tend to glamorize and exaggerate a person’s virtues, and most of the tributes to him were glowing, even if they did acknowledge (sometimes in passing) the one bad deed. It was, as if, “even though, Chap-a-qui-dick, nevertheless, he was a great legislator, the liberal lion, etc.”

Let’s face it – he killed a woman (directly or indirectly), drove off a bridge (probably while intoxicated), ran past four houses at which he could have summoned help, made no timely effort to rescue her, didn’t report it to the authorities for ten hours, allegedly tried to get a friend to claim that the friend was really the driver, was allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor because of the peculiarities of Massachusetts politics, and re-elected seven times because of the peculiarities of Massachusetts voters. (And I omit some of the more lurid rumors associated with this episode.) The penance, we are told, was that he did not become president – as if he had some prior claim to the presidency because his brother had been president and had been killed, and a second brother had been killed while running for office.

And yet… By all accounts, he was a very decent person. People who knew him, privately, even political opponents, or strangers with whom he had casual encounters, reported that he was decent, humble, generous, kind and sensitive. Certainly his politics, not my cup of tea or bowl of chowder, represented the old-school noblesse oblige – that those of noble origin are obligated to help those less fortunate. He was a strident political partisan, to be sure, but was always personally gracious to staffers, underlings and others not of his social class – even assisting strangers who would only later realize that it was Ted Kennedy who had helped them.

So now G-d judges.

But our question is: can a person overcome the effects of even one hideous act through a multitude of good acts ? And the answer is, perhaps surprisingly so: yes. In this morning’s Torah portion, we read (Devarim 29) that the covenant was ratified, the sojourn in the wilderness was almost complete, and life in the holy land was about to begin – and only one thing could derail G-d’s plans for the Jewish people, the one weak link: “lest there be among you a man, woman, family or tribe whose heart will turn away from our G-d in order to go and serve the gods of the nations.” The heinous crime of idolatry – of ascribing divine powers to nature or the creations of our own hands – has the capacity to ruin everything. But then the Torah adds something else “lest there be among you a root flourishing with worm and gall wood,” a poison, a rot, a bacteria in the body politic of Israel. What does this add to the mix ? Idolatry stands by itself ?

There is no worse sin than idolatry; it destroys our whole reason for existence – but it is not the simple act of idolatry that the Torah  cautions against, but “a root flourishing with worm and gall wood.” The real measure of each person is whether evil has taken root, whether it is ingrained, habitual, a pattern of odious conduct – or it is aberrational, a bizarre exception to the person’s normal mode of conduct. That is the key. A person is defined by what he does consistently – what his personality is – and not by his momentary lapses.

There is a phrase for this in Hebrew – “ba’al” – meaning, “master of..”. “Ba’al” means that one is in control, one dominates a particular area. One can be a “Ba’al tzedaka” (defined as charitable), a “Ba’al chesed” (defined as kind), or conversely a “Ba’al lashon hara” (an habitual slanderer), a “Ba’al dibur” in shul (a persistent talker, who comes to shul only to socialize), the latter two in contradistinction to the occasional gossiper or the talker). Persistent patterns of conduct define the person, not the exceptions. Just like we are not judged by what we say during moments of great stress (Bava Batra 16b) – so too we are not judged ultimately by anomalies, but by the norms of our lives, to what we are dedicated, about what we are passionate, by our persistent patterns of conduct.

The flip side of this – and because of this principle – is that we are taught never to despair, never to feel that we have sinned so grievously that repentance is impossible or unwelcome, never to think that we are too far gone ever to return. Certainly every sin and every bad act has to be atoned for, but there are no obstacles to repentance. Man sins. But man is given the mitzva of repentance as well.

That is why Ted Kennedy could be, properly, rehabilitated (even if his politics remained irredeemable !) –  and that is why as we look at some of the miscreants of the past year who disgraced our world, we might wish to gaze a little more benignly, and recognize that there is a difference between the sinner and the “root flourishing with worm and gall wood”, that we too are in need of divine compassion and that the challenge is before us is not to gloat or condescend – but to cultivate good traits and deeds, to keep our aberrations to a bare minimum, and to uproot entrenched areas of rebellion – in our personal and family lives, professionally and spiritually, in our shul or community, so that we may be defined as “masters of good character and good deeds, of charity and kindness.”

And then we will merit life and all of G-d’s blessings, and soon behold the day when all will perceive us as a holy people, worthy of divine redemption.

Haredi Follies

     On Sunday, I was driving on a narrow street in the Meah Shearim section of Jerusalem when suddenly, directly ahead of the car in front of me, a group of young Haredi men in their 20’s were gainfully occupied pulling a huge trash dumpster into the middle of the street in order to block it. I was forced to drive on the sidewalk to get through. What the cars in back of me did once the street was fully blocked is a mystery.

    Why did they choose to block their street and inconvenience dozens of innocent people ? I do not know, nor, frankly, do I care. I offer here the general and accurate disclaimer that the guilty are only a relative handful of people, not subject to the control or influence of mainstream Haredi rabbis, and a poor reflection on their milieu, their upbringing and on the Torah itself – walking, talking, breathing (but not working) examples of a Chillul Hashem, a desecration of G-d’s name. But these few are reflective of a broader problem.

      These individuals have become, like the Arabs (sad to say), people of perpetual and unassuageable grievances, who are at war with society, and even with the rest of the Torah world that has left them in the dust and successfully live normal lives in accordance with Torah law. Perhaps wearing long black coats and hats on hot, humid days nurtures an intense dissatisfaction with life, and understandably so. Perhaps the lamentable fact (publicized last week) that only 37% of Haredi men between the ages of 20-60 are gainfully employed (as opposed to the 80% employment rate of that bracket in the rest of society) is a source of internal frustration and shame that is projected onto the rest of the society via their anti-social acts. And perhaps, therefore, they should keep in mind the resentment generated in the society that supports them through an extensive welfare network, and remind themselves of the Talmudic adage not to “throw stones in the well from which you drink,” or its secular corollary: “don’t bite the hand that feeds you.”

     What galls most are not the pervasive, threatening admonitions of the modesty police that blanket that neighborhood, nor a parking lot in Yerushalayim opening on Shabbat, nor the arrest of a mentally ill, allegedly child-abusing mother, nor sundry other alleged grievances that lead the unemployed and unemployable “activists” to block streets, set fire to trash bins, attack the police, etc. What galls is rather the shame caused to the public face of Torah by a segment of society that is proudly incapable of applying the Torah to the realities of modern life, that boasts of its unwillingness to educate its children to contribute meaningfully to the world around them, and that has therefore emasculated the Torah and made it a dead document that few normal people – seeing the way they live – would want to embrace.

     Where a simple outsider sees “piety,” a more astute observer sees scrupulous observance of some Mitzvot and a wholesale disregard of others. The standard accusation against more modern Jews – that they “pick and choose” the mitzvot that suit them –applies with equal cogency to them: they may dress modestly, but many are public charges – violating the Talmudic mandate that one should “rather treat his Shabbat like a weekday than become dependent on public support.” They dutifully rest on Shabbat but treat its corollary – to “work for six days” – with disdain. They are close-knit but only within a narrowly-drawn circle; the concerns of other Jews, and love of other Jews, are not always readily apparent. If it were otherwise, they would not attempt to propagate their views by inconveniencing others, who are unsure of and uninterested in whatever point they are really making. Their study of Torah and observance of mitzvot are often punctuated by superstitions and irrational behavior that have no place among Torah Jews, including but not limited to fetishizing certain forms of dress. They can adopt every minority opinion – every stringency – except in the areas of Kavod habriyot, Ahavat Yisrael (respect for the dignity of others and the love of Jews), and several others as well.

     Their attempt in that small enclave to re-create the European shtetl has succeeded, at least to the extent that they have duplicated the grinding poverty that typified European Jews when we ignore the mythology and the nostalgia. And it is poverty that – just like in Europe – has no escape, as the educational constraints they place on themselves deprive them of any realistic opportunity to better themselves economically. And, as I see it, that is the primary source of their discontent – not the secularism, the immodesty, the Zionism that surrounds them – but the happiness, the satisfaction, and the contentment that so many others derive out of life – especially the Torah life – that they are denied. Unable to contribute or even to discourse with others, their sole recourse is to stones, imprecations, and blockades. How sad… To be given an opportunity to re-create a fully-Jewish life in a land of Israel under Jewish sovereignty, and instead to squander it – in the process, antagonizing even other Torah Jews. Many are misguided, and to a great extent, misled by their leaders. And I am unaware of even one Jew who performed even one mitzva or avoided one sin as a consequences of a stone being hurled his way.

     Fortunately, the tide is turning for Haredim, as the astute among them have realized that they can no longer afford either isolation or ignorance. Vocational schools for men and women have opened to teach them trades and allow them to earn a living with dignity, the Nachal Haredi has brought hundreds of Haredim into the IDF, the chesed organizations they administer benefit every segment of society (although the creation of more and more such organizations should not substitute for finding gainful employment) and the most prominent voices are decrying the ugliness that frequently emanates from their midst. All these are good signs, and at a most opportune time – as the rest of society (Torah Jews included) is exasperated. The hooligans who give them a bad name should be forcefully ostracized – excluded from shuls, shidduchim, residence in the neighborhood, etc. – just as someone would be if he, say, purchased a television set or some other moral offense. The outrages committed in the name of Haredim today are not any lesser moral offenses, and they must be eradicated – through a new educational curriculum that emphasizes not personal piety but community responsibility and love of Israel. They are in need of a Rav Kook, who can teach them how the Torah can be the foundation of a modern society and not just the basis of an 18th century Lithuanian village.

      As the Haredi population continues to grow, its current economic model is 15 years past the point of sustainability. Whether or not they succeed in adapting to new circumstances and the obligations concomitant with constituting a larger percentage of the general population will, to a large extent, determine not only the survivability of that community but also the very success of the enterprise of Jewish nationhood in the land of Israel in the coming decades. And for that reason, we pray for their success in uprooting the terrorists in their midst and adapting to the reality of modern life – in which the Haredim will play a natural role in presenting to the world the beautiful face of Torah.