Author Archives: Rabbi

Arizona Iced Tea Party

      The imbroglio in Arizona over its new and controversial anti-immigration law is a classic instance where politics has trumped law and common sense, inevitably engendering the current strife.

    On the surface, the anti-immigration bill seems innocuous enough, merely the precise restatement of an existing federal statute that permits the verification of the immigrant status of any individual and their deportation upon arrest. That federal law has been in existence for a quarter-century, and basically unenforced by a series of pusillanimous politicians pandering to the Hispanic vote, the theory being that Hispanic-Americans favor widespread immigration – even illegal – of other Hispanics, regardless of their effect on the society.

    And the effect – in states like Arizona, New Mexico, California and even New York – has been dramatic and mostly deleterious to the common weal. The federal government, nominally in charge of immigration matters through its constituent ICE (Immigrations and Customs Enforcement), has long refused – for the most part – to control the Southern border with Mexico, most of which is not even secured by a fence. Thousands pour in across the border monthly. In one infamous case, two Border Patrol agents were arrested and incarcerated for shooting at an illegal who was fleeing after selling drugs. The illegals bring with them crime – mostly drugs and scattered violence – and usually escape punishment. They drive without licenses or insurance, work without paying taxes, can be deported after arrest – simply to return on the next convoy.

     Certainly, many come to America only to seek a better life – but they mock the country’s laws and those who abided by them and came legally, waiting their turn and gaining the appropriate sponsors. As egregious, the federal government – not content to ignore its own laws – mandates that the states pay for free health care, public education and social services for these individuals. As they largely do not pay taxes, they receive far more in benefits than they pay into the system – and have brought many states to the brink of bankruptcy, and California (fiscal gimmicks aside) over the brink. These are not refugees fleeing persecution – but they are soaking up the limited resources of the state and depleting the budget that should be used for the benefit of the tax-paying citizens. No wonder Arizonans were outraged, so outraged that illegal immigration is now a …misdemeanor in Arizona.

      So if the law is already on the books, why the leftist outrage against Arizona ? Why the calls for a boycott ? What could possibly be a cogent argument against mere enforcement of a law designed to protect the country ?

      One approach – typical of the left and other non-thinkers – has been to label the law’s advocates “racists,” as if that needs no elaboration. Calling someone a “racist” (or its equivalents, “sexist,” “bigot,” “homophobe,” xenophobe”) has become a substitute for argument and reasoned discourse. To be accused of “racism” is an accusation that needs no evidence and cannot be disproved, and even taints the accused for life regardless of its merits. Analogously, the tea-party movement is now regularly subjected to the “racism” accusation because it is composed mainly of white people. (Of course, since 97% of blacks voted for President Obama – certainly having nothing to do with his race – the pool of non-whites who will publicly oppose his policies is relatively miniscule, a point apparently “lost” on these critics.)

     But each crime committed by an illegal – each mugging, each burglary, each drunk-driving, each homicide – further intensifies the strong feelings of the citizenry against them, and leaves good people with only three options: accept the status quo (non-enforcement by the federal government of its own laws), vigilante actions by individuals taking the law into their own hands, or passing a state law and empowering state law enforcement to crack down. They have chosen, rightly, the third option.

    The courts have not helped by prohibiting the police, in many jurisdictions, from even inquiring as to someone’s immigration status – even after arrest – bizarre, unless one realizes the power of the immigration lobby and the pathetic fear of the politicians that they will lose votes.  It is strange, no doubt, that those most affected by the rise of illegal immigration are those legal immigrants or unskilled workers whose jobs are being taken by the illegals. Some Hispanics have caught on to this; most blacks have yet to catch on. Illegal immigration harms their economic interests; but the politics of the matter and the cries of their racial-huckstering-leaders overwhelm their reason.

     The second argument raised against the bill also employs a phrase that is today, unthinkingly, fighting words in America: “racial profiling.” Indeed, the bill seems to profile based on race, giving law enforcement the right to detain for questioning anyone if there is “reasonable suspicion” that they are here illegally. Of course, how does such a “reasonable suspicion” arise – how does an illegal look ? Head down, furtive glances, dashing eyes, shifty feet ? Clearly, it targets Hispanics, and the law might not pass constitutional muster on that basis. But should it ?

    I have long questioned the reasonableness of laws, policies, or court decisions that are designed – in the first instance – to protect the criminals and the guilty (personal note: I am a former criminal defense attorney). I am fully aware of the regulations on illegal stops, searches and seizures, the Exclusionary Rule, and all the other safeguards dictated by the Supreme Court (Mapp, Gideon, Miranda and all the others). But does it make any sense ? In a saner time, Justice Cardozo (and YU’s Law School was named for him!) said: “Should the criminal go free because the constable has blundered?” By all means, penalize police officers who are abusive and themselves criminals. But we all forfeit certain rights for the greater good (most New Jerseyans cannot carry a firearm in public, and it is nearly impossible to be licensed for it). I cannot drive at 100 mph despite my superior driving skills. Do I object to having cameras in public places, monitored at some central location for the protection of the citizenry – like the ACLU objects, again and again ? No ! Why would I – I am not committing any crimes. Only the criminals – and their lobbyists – would object.

     If I was lurking in a strange neighborhood, looking like I didn’t belong, would I object to being asked for my identification ? Why would I ? I am probably just lost. Racial profiling was banned several years ago in New Jersey because minorities were being stopped disproportionately – and disproportionately found to be in possession of contraband ! So, what exactly is the objection ? Criminals usually fit a certain profile. We don’t object to invasive searches at the airport, even if they are unnecessary for most passengers. But we should object, for racial profiling works (of course the Israelis do it). Of course, airport security should be more focused on 25 year-olds named Ahmed than 75 year-old named Agnes; that is common sense. But common sense is in shorter and shorter supply. “Racial profiling” has become, illogically, malum in se, inherently evil. But if the majority of illegals in a certain geographical area are of a certain race or ethnicity, why shouldn’t they get greater scrutiny ? That makes sense, and if a small number of legal residents are mistakenly asked to show their drivers’ licenses for identification – so what ? It is a small inconvenience for the sake of a greater good. We are asked to show ID for a variety of innocuous acts – cashing a check, using a credit card, entering a government building – although, curiously but typically, not when it comes to voting – another hidden cost of the illegal invasion. We shouldn’t make a federal case – literally – out of a small inconvenience that ultimately benefits the inconvenienced.

     Already in America, the majority of citizens have the votes that demand that the minority support them. The welfare state is becoming stifling and oppressive. The citizens of Arizona – a little heavy-handed, to be sure, but left no real option – have risen up, whites and some blacks and Hispanics, to try to salvage their polity. They are being savaged by people with an agenda that threatens our way of life, and being made pariahs. They have said “enough,” and they are right.

    Jews have long benefited from America’s immigration policies – more than in any other country in the exile, and even considering the barriers erected in the 1920s and 1930s. We know what it is like to be an immigrant, to seek a better life on these shores, and so it is hard to oppose others who seek the same advantages. So we should support legal immigration – especially of those who come to give and not just to take – and join with what seems to be a majority of rational Americans in lending our support to the beleaguered citizens of Arizona. Buy Arizona Iced Tea (actually, a New York company). Build a fence, patrol it daily, arrest and deport all illegals.

    Otherwise, undoubtedly, Muslim terrorists will learn the easy access to America from its porous southern border – if they haven’t already – and we will have only ourselves to blame.

A Look in the Mirror

   When the findings of the National Jewish Population Survey (2000-2001) were released, it unleashed a torrent of controversy, clamor, and the customary competing conclusions. Some of the basic and tragic information assembled has already been widely disseminated: the shrinking Jewish population in the United States (estimated at 5.2 million self-proclaimed Jews, with the real Jewish population probably closer to 4 million), the rise in intermarriage (today 47% of Jews who marry actually marry a non-Jew), and the steady erosion of Jewish commitment to Torah, mitzvot, and support of Israel. 

     The above was duly publicized, if also somewhat sugar-coated in its distribution (e.g., “a smaller rate of increase in intermarriage”was held to be good news). What was not widely disseminated were the specific findings relating to Orthodox Jews in America. The results are fascinating, eye-opening, exhilarating, and depressing at the same time. In short: Orthodox Jews are thriving, the Jewish people generally are suffering – and so Orthodox Jews are suffering too.

     A note about methodology: A wag once said “figures lie, and liars can figure”. One can take any set of statistics and interpret them any which way. I have always maintained that these surveys grossly undercount the number of Orthodox Jews, because we are concentrated in a very small geographical area. More American Jews today live in the southern and western parts of America, but 2/3 of Orthodox Jews live in the Northeast – hence the plethora of kosher pizza stores nearby. Certainly drawing conclusions about the habits and beliefs of millions of people from a sample of 4500 respondents is a daunting task, but spreading those questionnaires across the country will of necessity diminish the Orthodox population – thousands of whom can reside in one apartment building in Brooklyn.

     And – perhaps the most subtle flaw – the responses were all voluntary and reflect the self-definition of the respondents. I.e., those who are Jews are those who say they are Jews, like those who are Orthodox are those who say they are Orthodox. Thus, these anomalies were generated: 22% of self-proclaimed Orthodox Jews said they carry or spend money on Shabbat, and 16% of self-proclaimed Orthodox Jews – according to the survey – claimed they do not keep kosher even at home. One wonders by what definition they construe themselves as Orthodox.

     Nonetheless, accepting the statistics as given, the results are still rather noteworthy. Approximately 10% of American Jews are Orthodox (their count), but – contrary to the  Hollywood stereotype of the Orthodox as the “old pious man with a white beard” – we are in fact the youngest of the ‘denominations’. We have the lowest percentage of elderly (over 65), and the highest percentage of youth (until age 17). We are so youthful, that fully 40% of all Jewish children are Orthodox. While the general Jewish population has fallen below reproduction rates (1.89 children per family), the Orthodox ranks are swelling.

     This is surely no surprise to us, as we have witnessed the growing need for new yeshivot, shuls, and mikvaot. It also bodes well for the future of Torah, notwithstanding the impossibility of predicting political or social trends in America.

     What does not surprise is our secret: a passionate commitment to living a Jewish life – including Torah study, mitzva observance, synagogue attendance, and, of course, Jewish education. More than 95% of Orthodox youth today receive a Torah education – perhaps the highest rate in Jewish history. Relative to the other ‘denominations’, we have the highest percentage of synagogue membership and attendance, fulfillment of basic commandments, and maintenance of Jewish institutions. For those who still maintain that the “Israel connection” will per se secure Jewish identity, the results are also sobering: roughly 75% of Orthodox Jews have visited Israel, whereas only 30% of non-Orthodox Jews have visited Israel. Apparently, commitment to Torah is the foundation on which an intense identification with Israel is forged – not vice versa.

     Even the 47% intermarriage rate for Jews is somewhat misleading. The numbers are that low only because of the low rate of Orthodox intermarriage (currently 6-7%). If we factor out the Orthodox population, we come to the very sad conclusion that the intermarriage rate far exceeds 60% – meaning that most non-Orthodox Jews, when they marry, will marry non-Jews.

     Factoring out the Orthodox population elsewhere in the survey exposes some dire findings. For example, 21% of all Jews keep kosher at home, but without the Orthodox, that percentage probably falls to only 15%. That means that, numerically, more Muslims in America keep kosher than Jews. Or, only 52% of all Jews “regard being Jewish as very important”; without the Orthodox population, that percentage falls well below 50% – meaning that, to our sorrow, most American Jews do not consider being Jewish very important at all. A few more decades along these lines and we will not need surveys to tell us the fate of American Jewry.

     What conclusions do we draw from all this ? Certainly, gloating over our successes is as unseemly as self-flagellation is unwarranted. We need not apologize for our achievements, earned through the sacrifices made by our parents and grandparents in an America much less friendly to Torah observance. And we are all hurt when Klal Yisrael is in a free fall, our numbers dwindle to record low levels, and Jewish ignorance soars to record heights. The greatest enemies of American Jews today are apathy and indifference, not Arabs, Muslims, Christians or neo-Nazis with spray paint. And we cannot impose commitment and responsibility on those who are unaffiliated and uninterested in Judaism. But we can and should always project the beauty of the Torah life, so those with open minds can look at us and perhaps realize “how fortunate is our lot, and how pleasant is our destiny”. We can redeem souls on an individual basis, one by one.

     We also should not trivialize the contributions of any Jew – whether in the realm of Torah study, support for Israel, Jewish philanthropy, or any expression of identification with the Jewish people, however marginal or slight. Great oak trees grow from small acorns, and every Jew is ultimately judged only by the Judge of Judges, and not by his fellow Jews.

     So where are we ten years later, anticipating the next such survey ? Likely, the Orthodox community has grown, the affiliated community has shrunk, the number of “Jews according to halacha” has fallen with many non-halachic Jews counted as Jews and integrated into the non-affiliated community, andwith the rate of intermarriage stagnant or in slight decline. (It is difficult to consider the marriage of two Jews – both children of non-Jewish mothers – an intermarriage, even if both can be recorded as Jews.) Support for Israel will have declined correspondingly, and Orthodox Jews will naturally have assumed a greater leadership role in general Jewish organizational life. So what do we gain from these surveys ?

      Surely the paramount message is something we have known since the dawn of our history: Torah works ! Rav Saadiah Gaon stated almost 11 centuries ago that “our people is a people only by virtue of the Torah”. There are no guarantees in life, but we do come close to one verity: those who wish to have Jewish children and grandchildren, those for whom Jewish life has meaning and the existence of a Jewish people has value, and those who seek to be part of the great destiny of the Jewish people must embrace and cherish the Torah, its ideals, practices and values.

      Those who do will overwhelmingly be in the vanguard of the Army of Hashem as we wage the struggles ahead to return Jews to our faith, vanquish the forces of hatred arrayed against us, and enjoy the spiritual pleasures of the coming redemption, speedily and in our days.

Israel Today

     Rav Shlomo Aviner (Rosh Yeshiva of Ateret Cohanim and Rav of Bet El) was once asked: is it appropriate to celebrate Yom Ha’atzmaut, when Israel has a secular government and is not yet a Torah state ? He answered that it is not only appropriate but also a mitzva to give thanks to G-d and not be indifferent or blasé about the re-establishment of Jewish sovereignty in the land of Israel. What generations pined for has come true in our day, and legions of Jews who dreamt of returning to Israel would probably be astonished at the impertinence of Jews who are disenchanted because statehood has not unfolded the way each person anticipated. There are always Jews who despair of any challenging situation ever improving; some despaired that Jews would ever return to our homeland, and some despair whether Jews will be able to retain our homeland. But the Torah obligates us to be appreciative of our gifts, and accept all challenges – personal and national – as divine opportunities to develop ourselves and perfect His world.

     It has been more than 40 years since my first trip here (yes, I was very young at the time). The roads, telephone service, culture, transportation, mails, business, etc. were, frankly, primitive. Israel existed – in the minds of many Jews, especially American Jews – as a refuge, a haven for the persecuted, somewhere for Jews from Russia, Ethiopia, Argentina, France, Yemen, Iran, etc. to flee when their hostile host governments turned on them. Neither beggars nor refugees can be choosers, so whatever meager services, housing, or job opportunities were offered sufficed for them, and for Jewish tourists as well. Israel as asylum still exists, of course, but it is much, much more than that. There is a flourishing, modern, and most livable country, with all – literally, all – the conveniences to which Western man has become accustomed. There has been a steep decline in “coerced aliya” of Jews hounded to Israel by our enemies and grateful for their mere survival. Most aliya today is, well, dream-like, of Jews who come here to live in a Jewish state, and who are able to live very well. It is a positive, voluntary, purposeful aliya, which still perplexes some Israelis but gladdens most of them. And that Jews today have the opportunity to come home, build a state, fully live the rhythms of Jewish life, and be proud and happy about it is something to cheer. Actually, it is something that should cause us to stand up, take notice of the hand of Providence, and, at least, be overcome with gratitude. Moreover, it should prompt a personal reckoning of whether each of us can become part of this historic undertaking, and how, and when. The prophet Yeshayahu (42:5, in the haftara for Breisheet) said that “God… gave a soul to the people who dwell on it [the land of Israel] and a spirit to those who walk on it.” (See Ketubot 111a as well.) What sounds trite to some and obvious to others is nonetheless true: the Jewish soul comes alive, and can be fully developed, only in Israel. Only here do we encounter the tableau on which the Torah is implemented, and only here do we find the opportunity to fulfill all the mitzvot. In a real sense, Jews in Israel live, and Jews in the exile live on spiritual “life support”. In galut, we remain tethered to the Torah and are sustained by the oxygen of mitzvot. But the Torah makes clear, again and again, that there is something artificial about it, and something essential that is missing. Here, just the breadth of subjects covered in weekly shiurim that deal with the interface of Torah and modern life are awe-inspiring corroboration that the Torah – in all its dimensions and grandeur – can be the foundation of a modern state. In the exile, the reach of Torah is necessarily truncated.

     That is not to sound Pollyannish about life here. (I am reminded of the old joke about the Israeli who told his friend that, despite all the problems in this part of the world, he has decided to be an optimist. Asked by his friend, if so, why do you look so despondent, he replied: “You think it’s easy to be an optimist ?”) What is most irksome about life here is the realization that every scoundrel, every thief, every rude driver, every indifferent bureaucrat, every corrupt politician, every person who expelled Jews from their homes and then turned his back on them, every person who is indifferent to the fate of the residents of Sderot, and every brutal police officer – is a fellow Jew. But what is most endearing about Israel is the realization that every ba’al chesed, every lover of Torah, every developer of the land of Israel, every stranger who inquires about your family and wants to set up his niece with your nephew, every store clerk – in whatever form of dress and whatever level of observance – who wishes you a heartfelt “Shabbat Shalom”, every person who took in the refugees of Gush Katif and visits the Jews of Sderot, or who sits around at night arguing over how to make the Jewish State better, or who rejoices in the smachot of every Jew, or who visits a perfect stranger who is sitting shiv’a (because each one is a brother or sister), every driver who abruptly cuts you off enabling you to see his bumper sticker that reads “Ein od mi’lvado” (“there is none beside G-d”), and every individual who cries over the fate of every Jew – is also a fellow Jew. There is a profound sense of family, the family of Israel. And, I suppose, even the scoundrel has a role to play in this great enterprise.

     To walk again good Jews who build Israel, learn Torah, raise families, serve in the army, do mitzvot, seek out chesed, and want to be part of the destiny of an eternal people in these momentous times is itself a blessing. May our share be with them, the builders of the “resting place” of the divine presence on earth. May we all soon merit finding our share in fulfilling the prophetic vision of old, and be present to welcome the son of David, speedily and in our days.

Shalom from Israel !

AMERICANIZATZYA

    Ever wonder why English is the language of both air traffic control and the Internet ? After all, far more people in the world speak Chinese, Arabic, Spanish and other languages. One factor might be that Americans created both (I think a former Vice-President brought us the Internet), or that Americans are also notoriously monolingual. But there is a more fundamental reason: America is a cultural hegemonist (I prefer that word to “imperialist”) and the world’s trendsetter. And nowhere is this more apparent than in Israel. American English is a second language in Israel, but even that does not convey the extent of its infiltration into Israeli society. It is not that you can get by without speaking Hebrew; indeed, it is difficult to embrace the society without speaking Hebrew. But English idioms have become commonplace in Israeli speech – and not just the “ya” endings of yesteryear (televizya, protektsiya). Listen to any Israeli speak – an ordinary citizen or media personality – and they will sprinkle their sentences with words or phrases like “why not, time, time out, so what, picnic, shopping, reform, focus, center, fight, loser, campaign, OK, activist, forum, compliment, chance, conflict” (pronounced con-FLICT, plural con-FLICT-im), not to mention technical terms like “internet, e-mail, fax, high-definition” and literally hundreds of other words. These words are all transliterated into Hebrew in the press. No doubt this is partly the influence of globalization, here known of course as “globalizatzya.” Rather than grasp for a Hebrew word, it is often easier just to say it in English, with the occasional conversionary suffixes. Preparing for a public speech a few weeks ago, I looked up the word “speculative”. I need not have; the Hebrew is “speculativi”. Occasionally, the pronunciations and etymologies are humorous. Liat Collins, who writes a language column in the Jerusalem Post, reported on an argument she had with her commander in the army many years ago, who gave her an “ool-ti-mah-tum” (ultimatum) claiming it was a Hebrew word and correcting her (she is British) when she insisted on pronouncing it “ul-ti-mah-tum”. (Of course, they were both wrong; ul-ti-may-tum). There is such a thing as the Academy for the Hebrew Language, but if it is not defunct, it is certainly moribund and irrelevant. On this subject, part of me wishes that “Saturday” would enter the Israeli lexicon in order to avoid hearing such non sequiturs as “On Shabbat, we drove to the Galil for a picnic”. Another part of me feels that at least use of the word “Shabbat” helps keep the idea of Shabbat alive, even if it is not observed properly. And if language in Israel is an amalgam of Hebrew, English and a little Arabic (my time here has been both achla and sababa), the culture itself is dominated by America and American entertainment. The reality TV craze in America has hit Israel with full force – the shows with the amateur survivors, singers, dancers, models, etc. are featured prominently and achieve high “ratings” (also a “Hebrew” word). Full disclosure: I have never watched any of those shows, either Israeli or American versions, but I have read about them. The most amusing American template that I have seen is “Ha-laila”, Israel’s Tonight Show. (“From Kikar Dizengoff in Tel Avivvvvv, it’s Halaila – starring Lior Schleiiiiiiiiin”!). It is rank mimicry of the late night talk shows in America – featuring the host, the monologue (I never would have thought that Asara B’Tevet could be mined for comic material!), the desk, the backdrop (Tel Aviv, instead of New York City or Hollywood), the sofa chairs, the band and the banter with the bandleader. (The celebrities are a little third-tier. A singer performing at a kiosk in Ashkelon ?) No institution in society is spared the comic barbs of the amiable host – politicians, the army, the Haredim, the Arabs, even the Tel Avivians. But if imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then America, consider yourself flattered, and then some. The penetration of all things American (including glitzy political campaigns that mask inept and often corrupt politicians) certainly enables American olim to make an easier adjustment. The comfort level with English and American culture is such that living in Israel can have quite a familiar feel. (I even watch Fox News Channel here.) I wonder though at what cost, and whether indeed olim – especially religious olim – are looking to find the 51st State here. I think most are not, and not only because of the occasional decadence of Western culture but rather because of a desire to develop and immerse themselves in an indigenous Israeli, or religious-Jewish culture, befitting a Jewish state. Certainly, the culture as it is has little general appeal to the more traditional elements in society. Religious Jews have begun in the last decade or so to fashion purely religious cultural offerings – literature and movies – and of course religious music has been a powerhouse for several decades already. And religious Jews are blessed with a plethora of shiurim¬ – every night of the week, and on an immense variety of topics – in almost every community in the country. (I do wish Israelis had a keener sense of time. It is not atypical for an evening shiur to start 15-45 minutes after the scheduled time, almost like a Syrian-Jewish wedding. I have begun asking Rabbanim if their shiurim are starting “on time” or “on Israel time.” One answered: “Well, we are in Israel.” Major exception: I attended this week the World Conference of Orthodox Rabbis, under the auspices of the WZO, and it ran like clockwork.) But it is very difficult to combat a cultural behemoth like the United States. The revolution against Greek culture during the second Bet HaMikdash era began right here in Modiin. Yet, it is worth recalling that despite the Chanuka success, Shimon the Maccabee’s own great-grandsons (less than 100 years later) bore the fine Greek names Hyrkonus and Aristobolus, fought each other for the throne, and self-destructed. Even the Chashmonaim succumbed in the end to Greek cultural dominance, and with it, their kingdom fell and their legacy was tarnished. That Israel sees itself as living in the cultural shadow of America – even, at times, as America’s step-child – often has grave political ramifications. There is almost a palpable fear – completely unwarranted, I think – of denying almost any American request, as if the child Israel must always have the approval of the parent America. Israeli politicians loathe saying “no” to the United States; no other country in the world today has such hesitation. PM Netanuyahu, to his credit, is learning but the potential for recidivism always exists. Israelis speak of “American pressure” as if it is impossible to resist, and politicians routinely contrive “American pressure” to justify their own poor decisions. “Please, twist my arm, please?!”(For example, the United States was uninvolved in the Oslo process at the beginning, and President Bush opposed the “Gaza Expulsion Plan” for the better part of two years.) A country with its own culture shapes its own destiny, and develops a strong sense of national pride. American culture may be a dominant world power, but, in truth, it is scarcely felt in countries like Russia or China which have a rich cultural tradition of their own. There is an indigenous Israeli culture, but it is overwhelmed by America’s. Israelis write books, but the bookstores are mainly filled with Hebrew translations of American best-sellers. In time, and given the right circumstances, Israel will surely develop a culture that is uniquely Jewish and that touches the mind, heart and soul. Witnessing the national mourning on Yom HaShoah, and seeing the preparations for Yom Haatzmaut to come, one realizes that there is an Israel unto itself, with which outsiders scarcely identify. That is all part of building a state, liberating the Jewish spirit from centuries of exile, and shaping the national character that will engender “a kingdom of priests and a holy people.”

Shalom from Israel !