Monthly Archives: March 2008

Words Dishearten, Demoralize – And Kill – Jewish Press 4/19/2008

Posted on March 19, 2008 | Leave a comment

ITEM: The Jerusalem Post (March 10) vividly recounted the heroism of Capt. David Shapira, a former student at Mercaz HaRav, who, hearing gunfire at the yeshiva during the recent terrorist atrocity, grabbed his weapon, left his nearby home, and ran to the rescue of Jewish children:

“At the entrance to the yeshiva in the capital’s Kiryat Moshe neighborhood, Shapira ran into a group of police officers who were standing outside the building, listening to the gunshots from inside. They warned him not to go in, but Shapira pushed them aside and entered. The officer tracked the terrorist to the library, and shot 16 bullets at the terrorist, immediately neutralizing him.”
Were Jewish police officers actually “standing outside the building” while Jewish children inside were being methodically, systematically murdered?

ITEM: The next day, the Post reported Israel had apparently agreed to an Egyptian initiative of a 30-day “period of calm” in which Jerusalem would cease “ground and air attacks in the Gaza Strip and refrain from retaliating for the terror attack at Mercaz HaRav.”
Undoubtedly, this will enable the enemy to smuggle in more and deadlier weapons as it prepares for the next round of hostilities against a nation that apparently will not defend itself or its citizens.
PERSONAL ITEM: On March 11, while driving home on Route 443 (the popular Modiin-Jerusalem highway), my sister and brother-in-law’s car was stoned by Arabs less than a kilometer from the Atarot checkpoint and within sight of an army base. Within minutes, more than a dozen cars arrived, stoned like theirs, with shattered headlights, broken windshields and dented hoods. Police and army personnel, duly informed of the danger lurking within walking distance of their location, told their fellow citizens that because the Arab assailants were standing behind the security fence, there was nothing they could do about it.
Words kill, dishearten and eventually demoralize decent, law-abiding people who are proud to live in a Jewish state. Words maim and injure – but in real time, when uttered by policemen, by soldiers, by politicians to their citizens that they will not be defended, that their lives are expendable, that their personal safety is not a priority. And words demoralize.
Had American naval hero John Paul Jones declared to the attacking British in 1779 “I will not begin to fight”; had Winston Churchill stood in the House of Commons in 1940 and proclaimed “We shall not fight in the fields nor in the streets, we shall not fight in the hills; we shall surrender”; had Douglas MacArthur left Bataan in 1942 with the stirring words “I shall not return,” they would all be – justly – disreputable figures, scorned by their nations and forgotten by history. The battles they fought would have been lost.
But such is the dispirited and dysfunctional leadership provided by the Olmert government and its immediate predecessors to the people of Israel today – a relentless message of defeatism, hopelessness, vulnerability and despair.
In the current issue of Azure (Winter 2008), Assaf Sagiv lamented modern Israel’s peculiar inversion of normative security policy. Usually, a nation risks its soldiers’ lives in order to protect its civilian population. That is why nations maintain armies to secure their borders and police departments to keep order in their cities. But in Israel today, the civilian population – in Sderot, Ashkelon, and elsewhere – is left in jeopardy in order not to risk the lives of the soldiers in combat. It is worse than unprecedented; it is a policy that crosses the line separating the simply bizarre from the truly inexplicable.
Certainly no sane person wishes for a war that will cost lives, but no sensible nation (that is, a nation that does not have a death wish) allows its civilians to be the constant targets of rockets, missiles, bombs and bullets without an effective response, in order to protect its soldiers from carrying out the missions for which they were drafted and trained.
Such pusillanimity – combined with Israel’s adoption of the enemy’s narrative that any military response is “disproportionate” and that every attack kills “innocent civilians” – only emboldens the enemy and eviscerates whatever feeble deterrence Israel still has.
Is it possible the Olmert government is laying the foundation for future horrific concessions on the grounds that Israel’s weak security posture leaves it no choice but to cut the best deal with the surging enemy and hope for the best? Sadly, it is, and would explain as well why Israel – alone among the countries of the world – cannot seem to say “no” to Secretary of State Rice. It is a nifty two-step, of asking to be pressured and then “caving in” to the pressure, but also fecklessness of an unimaginable magnitude.
Worse, Olmert’s constantly discouraging words completely underestimate the resilience, faith and courage of the Israeli people and its security forces. They endanger the lives of every man, woman and child in Israel, every resident and every tourist who walks its streets and travels its roads.
Islamic fundamentalism – the modern incarnation of Amalek – will not disappear as a result of wishful thinking and wild fantasies. While the Jews of Shushan were perplexed and bewildered upon learning of Haman’s nefarious scheme, their leaders Mordechai and Esther – Torah Jews and thinking people – formulated a plan of action to turn the tide, transform the situation and take the war to the enemy. They did not sit back passively bemoaning their fate, pleading weakness or making empty threats with blustery words that are mocked by the enemy (words that ultimately kill innocent Jews). And their efforts were rewarded with the intervention of the divine hashgacha that effected the salvation of the Jewish people and the annihilation of our foes.
The Jewish people will always respond to a leadership that instills in us faith and fortitude based on the wisdom of Torah, the imperatives of Jewish history and the call of Jewish destiny. Such leadership is sorely lacking today. Instead, Israel’s current band of incompetents has already led the country into one failed war and is incapable of planning for and successfully waging the next. Their speeches are clueless and their policies are incoherent.

Those are the real words that kill, and when that vacuous rhetoric is replaced by a truly Jewish leadership of ideas, substance and strength we will merit a revolution of Jewish life and fortune, triumph over the Amalek of our day and salvation as in the days of yore.

Rabbi Steven Pruzansky is spiritual leader of Congregation Bnai Yeshurun in Teaneck, New Jersey.

→ Leave a comment

Posted in Current Events

The Truth About RCA Geirus – Jewish Press – 3/12/2008

Posted on March 12, 2008 | Leave a comment

 There is a sign hanging in my office that should be standard in the office of every rabbi, communal leader, worker for Klal Yisrael or activist of any sort. It reads: “For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism.” And so goes the overheated, misleading, and at times blatantly false reaction by several of my distinguished RCA colleagues to the RCA’s recent promulgation of the Geirus Policies and Standards (GPS).

Let us sort through the myths and the facts.

         Myth: The Jewish Week headlined its report “RCA Seen as Caving in on Conversions”  (to the Chief Rabbinate of Israel). That headline is a contemptible untruth. Having served from its inception on the GPS Committee that formulated the standards, I can state that the reality is the Rabbanut never once suggested an approach to conversion in America, a change in any of our standards, or the adoption of any of their standards.
 
         Myth: The GPS calls for the re-evaluation of all conversions done in the past by RCA rabbis. This is an especially despicable falsehood, as it serves only to make generations of converts in the Jewish community anxious about their status and acceptance in the community at large. The reality is that not one past geirus is being reviewed by the RCA or its Beth Din of America, and such was never contemplated. To even suggest otherwise is to blatantly violate the Torah’s numerous admonitions against tormenting the ger.
       Myth: The RCA is shifting “to the right” (whatever that means) and has now adopted a series of harsh and restrictive regulations that will hinder the ability of non-Jews to convert. The reality is that these standards are not new, but an expression of the majority opinion in halacha as interpreted through the ages and historically applied by the overwhelming majority of RCA rabbis involved in geirus.
 
         The proximate cause of the promulgation of the GPS was the sense – here and in Israel – that some rabbis, both inside and outside the RCA, were not adhering to any reasonable benchmark by which geirus has traditionally been executed. This situation had to be rectified in order to protect the integrity of geirus in America and to facilitate a convert’s acceptance in Israel should he or she choose to make aliyah.
 
         Myth: The Chief Rabbinate will sit in judgment of each American geirus – past, present and future. Well, there is a kernel of truth in every bushel of lies. But this point is nothing new. Certainly the Rabbanut has no standing (or interest) to review the geirus that occurs outside Israel until and unless there is some Israel nexus, such as when the convert makes aliyah. But this has always been the case.
 
         As a pulpit rabbi, I have provided dozens of affidavits to the Rabbanut attesting to the Jewishness of my members who were born Jews or who converted according to halacha andwho wished to make aliyah or marry in Israel. And this is justly the province and domain of the Chief Rabbinate, and its legal authority under Israeli law. In this instance, the GPS makes the process easier, as participating regional batei din in the network of the RCA, under the auspices of the Beth Din of America, are pre-certified to have their conversions accepted by the Rabbanut.
 
         A convert who (sadly) never contemplates aliyah or does not marry in the State of Israel will never have any contact with the Rabbanut on these matters.
 
         Myth: The Chief Rabbinate will not recognize any conversion performed outside the GPS framework. This is also completely false. Any rabbi – RCA or otherwise – can continue to perform conversions on his own and apply to the Rabbanut for acceptance. The considerations the Rabbanut will use are its alone, and completely within its purview. I suspect that some conversions will be accepted, and others rejected – as it has always been.
 
         Beyond the myths, there is a bigger picture that needs to be considered. One of the most joyous moments in the rabbinate, for me, has been presiding over the conversion process. In a single instant, a non-Jew accepts upon himself not only the laws and customs that regulate Jewish life but also the history and destiny of our covenantal people. A conversion properly conducted and performed is fraught with solemnity, consequence and elation. The process should require intense study, a steadily increasing commitment to halachic practice, and climaxing in a complete acceptance of the mitzvos while standing in the mikveh.
 
         Nevertheless, it has long been an open secret in the United States (filtered over time to rabbinic authorities in Israel) that there were some American rabbis – again, both members and non-members of the RCA – who officiated at conversions that lacked these prerequisites. Apparently there were rabbis who took substantial sums of money for conversions, turning this sublime process into a lucrative business. There were rabbis who were forced to convert non-Jews under duress, as in the (hypothetical) shul president stating: “Convert my future daughter-in-law or find another job.”
 
         There were rabbis who were lax in applying the appropriate halachic standards and not insisting, expecting or even contemplating that there would be kabbalas hamitzvos in any realistic way – conversions without a genuine commitment to observance of Shabbos, kashrus, taharas hamishpacha and other staples of Jewish life.
 
         They asked questions with a wink and received the appropriate answers by the candidates, as if they were reading from a script. (And in almost every such case the conversions were performed for the purpose of marriage. Why else would a rabbi even think of converting a non-Jew who does not wish to observe Jewish law, except for some pressing ulterior concern that itself undermines the very fabric of geirus?)
 
         There were rabbis who were negligent even in the technical performance of the act of geirus, including a failure to observe the immersion in the mikveh. There were rabbis who converted non-Jewish women knowing they would marry kohanim in violation of Torah law. There were some who availed themselves of every leniency and loophole, ensuring that pro forma conversions would take place that would satisfy the needs of the member in question but not necessarily the letter or spirit of the law.
 
         (Lest the reader think there was pervasive chaos, the “rabbis” referred to in the examples above were usually the very same small number of people.)
 
         The GPS Committee performed a vital public service in formulating and disseminating these standards. The formation of regional batei din across the United States – and the ban on the sponsoring or teaching rabbi from serving as a dayan for someone he himself taught or guided – ensure that the individual rabbi is shielded from undue pressure to perform a conversion that is unsatisfactory and lacking in halachic substance.
 
         These dozen batei din, and the more than forty rabbanim who serve on them, have the full backing of the Chief Rabbinate, ensuring that converts who are potential olim receive a royal welcome home. And, I suspect, the existence of these batei din will sharply reduce the number of non-Jews who convert solely for marriage or some other inducement. Further, the GPS deals sensitively with gerim who are contemplating marriage but wish to convert sincerely, with intermarried couples that want to re-enter the community of committed Jews, and with infertile couples who wish to adopt a non-Jewish child and confer merit upon him under the wings of the Divine Presence.
 
         With all due respect, I must strongly object to my colleagues’ demagoguery, which serves only to alarm true and sincere converts as well as promote these esteemed rabbis’ own private, political agenda. The GPS Committee – comprised of a geographic and hashkaficcross-section of the RCA – labored over 18 months to produce an appropriate formula that universalizes standards for geirus but that nonetheless allows for the flexibility needed in evaluating something as subjective as another person’s commitment and sincerity. It has, perhaps, the support of 97% of the RCA membership. It is fair, honorable, sensitive, just and moral.
 
         Its opponents, rather than talk in flowery generalities, must answer the following:
 
         Do you require from prospective converts a genuine commitment to observance of Shabbos, kashrus, and other fundamental areas of Jewish law? If not, please state so openly.
 
         Do you perform conversions in which there is willful blindness to reality in order to accommodate those whose commitment is lacking, and have you ever officiated at a conversion in which you were doubtful of the candidate’s sincere commitment to Torah and mitzvos? If so, please state so openly.
 
         Do you feel you are performing a public service in adding to the ranks of the Jewish people those who do not share our value system, our lifestyle or our destiny – thereby transforming good and decent non-Jews into sinning Jews? If so, please state precisely the nature of that public service, explain the reasoning behind that disservice to non-Jews as well as the justification that underlies the unbridled attack on the sincere efforts of your colleagues.
 

         Certainly, for every action there is an equal and opposite criticism – if only the criticism would be reasonable, measured, truthful and justified.

 
         With the GPS system in place, a stumbling block has been removed from the process of conversion and the process itself simplified; the honor of righteous converts has been redeemed; the privilege of joining the Jewish people given its proper credence; and, most important, the Torah has been magnified and glorified.
 

         Rabbi Steven Pruzansky is spiritual leader of Congregation Bnai Yeshurun in Teaneck, New Jersey, treasurer of the Rabbinical Council of America, a member of the Geirus Policies and Standards Committee, and the rosh beit din of the Beit Din L’Giyur in Bergen County where, he reports, GPS guidelines are already in place and functioning superbly.

→ Leave a comment

Posted in Current Events